Is it a violation of U.S. law for a domestic company to import goods created by forced or indentured child labor if this labor is accepted in the foreign country?

Is it a violation of U.S. law for a domestic company to import goods created by forced or indentured child labor if this labor is accepted in the foreign country?

• A. True
• B. False
• C. Only with special permits.
• D. Depends on the goods type.

Answer: (A)

The premise of the question involves fundamental principles of U.S. law concerning human rights and labor standards. Under the Tariff Act of 1930, specifically Section 307, the importation of goods produced by forced or indentured child labor is prohibited, regardless of whether such practices are accepted in the country of origin. This law reflects the U.S. commitment to upholding human rights and ensuring that American consumers are not supporting exploitation through their purchasing choices. The essence of this legislation is that it does not matter if the foreign country permits child labor; if the goods are produced under conditions of forced or indentured labor, they cannot legally enter the U.S. market. This prohibition is a crucial component of trade policy aimed at discouraging and preventing human rights abuses globally. Thus, the assertion is that importing such goods is indeed a violation of U.S. law.

The premise of the question involves fundamental principles of U.S. law concerning human rights and labor standards. Under the Tariff Act of 1930, specifically Section 307, the importation of goods produced by forced or indentured child labor is prohibited, regardless of whether such practices are accepted in the country of origin. This law reflects the U.S. commitment to upholding human rights and ensuring that American consumers are not supporting exploitation through their purchasing choices.

The essence of this legislation is that it does not matter if the foreign country permits child labor; if the goods are produced under conditions of forced or indentured labor, they cannot legally enter the U.S. market. This prohibition is a crucial component of trade policy aimed at discouraging and preventing human rights abuses globally. Thus, the assertion is that importing such goods is indeed a violation of U.S. law.